Why Coles misjudged the plastic bag backlash
- Our network
Subscribe
The Sydney Morning Herald
Subscribe
- Opinion
- Business
- Consumer affairs
- Pollution
"@context":"http://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":["@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":"@id":"https://www.smh.com.au/business","name":"Business","@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":"@id":"https://www.smh.com.au/business/consumer-affairs","name":"Consumer affairs","@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":"@id":"https://www.smh.com.au/topic/pollution-60n","name":"Pollution"]
Why Coles misjudged the plastic bag backlash
Honestly, the plastic bag furore surprised me. On the whole, supermarkets are pretty good at shaping behaviour. Product placement, the music, even the smell is designed to ensure we buy in certain ways.
So how is it that our clued-up retailers are having such as hard time removing those convenient but environmentally unfriendly plastic bags? It’s a behaviour-shaping move that should be right in their wheelhouse, so what went wrong?
Sociologists argue that we live in two worlds: one where social norms dominate and the other where market norms dominate. And we have historically been pretty good at keeping those worlds separate.
For a long time, corporations happily operated under a market norm, and customers were happy with that. But increasingly, businesses are noticing emerging trends and social norms, and are putting them to work selling. Companies, including supermarkets, routinely shape narratives to consumers and set social bargains with them, based on these social norms.
Coles and Woolworths position themselves as a partner to Australian families, offering convenience, low prices and unfettered choice. It was a market play at heart, based on low cost and a sleek supply chain rather than differentiation, but it came wrapped in a social norm of support and reliability. We knew we were paying for bags, but it was politely indirect, unlimited and handy.
Then supermarkets heard a growing expectation of environmental stewardship. They heard consumers telling them that food at any cost wasn’t enough anymore and that we were looking for leadership in sustainability.
At this point, common wisdom suggests supermarkets needed to do two things: make a choice to support sustainability, and talk to their customers about it. And they did. They decided to cut "free" plastic bags, they set a date and stuck to the plan. But far from shaping behaviour, they irritated consumers.
The backlash against the Coles flip-flop wasn't caused by a lack of communication - it was well advertised, and the reasons were well known. You could say they should have stuck to their guns, but arguably they responded quickly to customer feedback. But however you characterise the issue, customers were not prepared to trade the convenience they paid for and were used to for what appeared to be just a saving for Coles.
They weren’t just tweaking things a bit, so it wasn’t a question of communication. It was a major renegotiation of their bargain with customers and their role in our lives.
Companies need to think long and hard before they decide to force a change of norms. It’s a truly strategic move and not a communications activity. It is going to hit the bottom line. If you aren’t ready for that, stick with market norms until change is enshrined in legislation and creates an even playing field.
But if you want to take leadership and force a change, be ready to bear the innovation costs that brings, with the deep research, creative solutions and executive leadership that entails.
Those organisations that have the courage to stick with this sort of deep strategy and brave any short-term fluctuations are rewarded with more loyal customers and brand advocates.
Lisa Hagan is a director of Pivot, a strategic business consultancy and part of the Frost Collective.
- Pollution
- Opinion
Most Viewed in Business
A relationship banned under traditional law.
Our new podcast series from the team behind Phoebe's Fall
View episodes
- Our network
Subscribe
The Sydney Morning Herald
Subscribe
- Opinion
- Business
- Consumer affairs
- Pollution
"@context":"http://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":["@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":"@id":"https://www.smh.com.au/business","name":"Business","@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":"@id":"https://www.smh.com.au/business/consumer-affairs","name":"Consumer affairs","@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":"@id":"https://www.smh.com.au/topic/pollution-60n","name":"Pollution"]
Why Coles misjudged the plastic bag backlash
Honestly, the plastic bag furore surprised me. On the whole, supermarkets are pretty good at shaping behaviour. Product placement, the music, even the smell is designed to ensure we buy in certain ways.
So how is it that our clued-up retailers are having such as hard time removing those convenient but environmentally unfriendly plastic bags? It’s a behaviour-shaping move that should be right in their wheelhouse, so what went wrong?
Sociologists argue that we live in two worlds: one where social norms dominate and the other where market norms dominate. And we have historically been pretty good at keeping those worlds separate.
For a long time, corporations happily operated under a market norm, and customers were happy with that. But increasingly, businesses are noticing emerging trends and social norms, and are putting them to work selling. Companies, including supermarkets, routinely shape narratives to consumers and set social bargains with them, based on these social norms.
Coles and Woolworths position themselves as a partner to Australian families, offering convenience, low prices and unfettered choice. It was a market play at heart, based on low cost and a sleek supply chain rather than differentiation, but it came wrapped in a social norm of support and reliability. We knew we were paying for bags, but it was politely indirect, unlimited and handy.
Then supermarkets heard a growing expectation of environmental stewardship. They heard consumers telling them that food at any cost wasn’t enough anymore and that we were looking for leadership in sustainability.
At this point, common wisdom suggests supermarkets needed to do two things: make a choice to support sustainability, and talk to their customers about it. And they did. They decided to cut "free" plastic bags, they set a date and stuck to the plan. But far from shaping behaviour, they irritated consumers.
The backlash against the Coles flip-flop wasn't caused by a lack of communication - it was well advertised, and the reasons were well known. You could say they should have stuck to their guns, but arguably they responded quickly to customer feedback. But however you characterise the issue, customers were not prepared to trade the convenience they paid for and were used to for what appeared to be just a saving for Coles.
They weren’t just tweaking things a bit, so it wasn’t a question of communication. It was a major renegotiation of their bargain with customers and their role in our lives.
Companies need to think long and hard before they decide to force a change of norms. It’s a truly strategic move and not a communications activity. It is going to hit the bottom line. If you aren’t ready for that, stick with market norms until change is enshrined in legislation and creates an even playing field.
But if you want to take leadership and force a change, be ready to bear the innovation costs that brings, with the deep research, creative solutions and executive leadership that entails.
Those organisations that have the courage to stick with this sort of deep strategy and brave any short-term fluctuations are rewarded with more loyal customers and brand advocates.
Lisa Hagan is a director of Pivot, a strategic business consultancy and part of the Frost Collective.
- Pollution
- Opinion
Most Viewed in Business
A relationship banned under traditional law.
Our new podcast series from the team behind Phoebe's Fall
View episodes
- Our network
Subscribe
The Sydney Morning Herald
Subscribe
- Opinion
- Business
- Consumer affairs
- Pollution
"@context":"http://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":["@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":"@id":"https://www.smh.com.au/business","name":"Business","@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":"@id":"https://www.smh.com.au/business/consumer-affairs","name":"Consumer affairs","@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":"@id":"https://www.smh.com.au/topic/pollution-60n","name":"Pollution"]
Why Coles misjudged the plastic bag backlash
Honestly, the plastic bag furore surprised me. On the whole, supermarkets are pretty good at shaping behaviour. Product placement, the music, even the smell is designed to ensure we buy in certain ways.
So how is it that our clued-up retailers are having such as hard time removing those convenient but environmentally unfriendly plastic bags? It’s a behaviour-shaping move that should be right in their wheelhouse, so what went wrong?
Sociologists argue that we live in two worlds: one where social norms dominate and the other where market norms dominate. And we have historically been pretty good at keeping those worlds separate.
For a long time, corporations happily operated under a market norm, and customers were happy with that. But increasingly, businesses are noticing emerging trends and social norms, and are putting them to work selling. Companies, including supermarkets, routinely shape narratives to consumers and set social bargains with them, based on these social norms.
Coles and Woolworths position themselves as a partner to Australian families, offering convenience, low prices and unfettered choice. It was a market play at heart, based on low cost and a sleek supply chain rather than differentiation, but it came wrapped in a social norm of support and reliability. We knew we were paying for bags, but it was politely indirect, unlimited and handy.
Then supermarkets heard a growing expectation of environmental stewardship. They heard consumers telling them that food at any cost wasn’t enough anymore and that we were looking for leadership in sustainability.
At this point, common wisdom suggests supermarkets needed to do two things: make a choice to support sustainability, and talk to their customers about it. And they did. They decided to cut "free" plastic bags, they set a date and stuck to the plan. But far from shaping behaviour, they irritated consumers.
The backlash against the Coles flip-flop wasn't caused by a lack of communication - it was well advertised, and the reasons were well known. You could say they should have stuck to their guns, but arguably they responded quickly to customer feedback. But however you characterise the issue, customers were not prepared to trade the convenience they paid for and were used to for what appeared to be just a saving for Coles.
They weren’t just tweaking things a bit, so it wasn’t a question of communication. It was a major renegotiation of their bargain with customers and their role in our lives.
Companies need to think long and hard before they decide to force a change of norms. It’s a truly strategic move and not a communications activity. It is going to hit the bottom line. If you aren’t ready for that, stick with market norms until change is enshrined in legislation and creates an even playing field.
But if you want to take leadership and force a change, be ready to bear the innovation costs that brings, with the deep research, creative solutions and executive leadership that entails.
Those organisations that have the courage to stick with this sort of deep strategy and brave any short-term fluctuations are rewarded with more loyal customers and brand advocates.
Lisa Hagan is a director of Pivot, a strategic business consultancy and part of the Frost Collective.
- Pollution
- Opinion
Most Viewed in Business
A relationship banned under traditional law.
Our new podcast series from the team behind Phoebe's Fall
View episodes
- Our network
Subscribe
Subscribe
The Sydney Morning Herald
Subscribe
The Sydney Morning Herald
The Sydney Morning Herald
Subscribe
- Home
- Sydney
- NSW
Politics- Federal
- NSW
- Victoria
- Queensland
- ACT
- Western Australia
Business- The economy
- Markets
- Companies
- Banking & finance
- Small business
- Consumer affairs
- Workplace
World- North America
- Europe
- Asia
- Middle East
- Oceania
- Central America
- South America
- Africa
National- Victoria
- Queensland
- ACT
- Western Australia
- Opinion
- Property
Sport- NRL
- Rugby Union
- AFL
- Soccer
- Cricket
- Racing
- Motorsport
- Netball
- Cycling
- Tennis
- Basketball
- Golf
- NFL
- Athletics
- Swimming
- Boxing
- Sailing
World Cup 2018- Fixtures
- Standings
- Teams
- Socceroos
Entertainment- Movies
- TV & Radio
- Music
- Celebrity
- Books
- Comedy
- Dance
- Musicals
- Opera
- Theatre
- Art & design
- TV guide
Lifestyle- Life & relationships
- Health & wellness
- Fashion
- Beauty
- Horoscopes
Money- Super & retirement
- Investing
- Banking
- Borrowing
- Saving
- Tax
- Planning & budgeting
- Insurance
- Education
- Healthcare
Environment- Conservation
- Climate Change
- Sustainability
- Weather
- Technology
- Cars
- Travel
- Food & wine
- Executive style
- Today's Paper
- For subscribers
- Letters
- Editorial
- Column 8
- Obituaries
- Good Weekend
- Quizzes
- Weather
- The Sydney Morning Herald
- The Age
- Brisbane Times
- WAtoday
- The Canberra Times
- The Australian Financial Review
- Domain
- Commercial Real Estate
- Allhomes
- Drive
- Good Food
- Traveller
- Executive Style
- Over Sixty
- Essential Baby
- Essential Kids
- Find A Babysitter
- The Store
- Weatherzone
- RSVP
- Adzuna
- Opinion
- Business
- Consumer affairs
- Pollution
"@context":"http://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":["@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":"@id":"https://www.smh.com.au/business","name":"Business","@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":"@id":"https://www.smh.com.au/business/consumer-affairs","name":"Consumer affairs","@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":"@id":"https://www.smh.com.au/topic/pollution-60n","name":"Pollution"]
Why Coles misjudged the plastic bag backlash
Honestly, the plastic bag furore surprised me. On the whole, supermarkets are pretty good at shaping behaviour. Product placement, the music, even the smell is designed to ensure we buy in certain ways.
So how is it that our clued-up retailers are having such as hard time removing those convenient but environmentally unfriendly plastic bags? It’s a behaviour-shaping move that should be right in their wheelhouse, so what went wrong?
Sociologists argue that we live in two worlds: one where social norms dominate and the other where market norms dominate. And we have historically been pretty good at keeping those worlds separate.
For a long time, corporations happily operated under a market norm, and customers were happy with that. But increasingly, businesses are noticing emerging trends and social norms, and are putting them to work selling. Companies, including supermarkets, routinely shape narratives to consumers and set social bargains with them, based on these social norms.
Coles and Woolworths position themselves as a partner to Australian families, offering convenience, low prices and unfettered choice. It was a market play at heart, based on low cost and a sleek supply chain rather than differentiation, but it came wrapped in a social norm of support and reliability. We knew we were paying for bags, but it was politely indirect, unlimited and handy.
Then supermarkets heard a growing expectation of environmental stewardship. They heard consumers telling them that food at any cost wasn’t enough anymore and that we were looking for leadership in sustainability.
At this point, common wisdom suggests supermarkets needed to do two things: make a choice to support sustainability, and talk to their customers about it. And they did. They decided to cut "free" plastic bags, they set a date and stuck to the plan. But far from shaping behaviour, they irritated consumers.
The backlash against the Coles flip-flop wasn't caused by a lack of communication - it was well advertised, and the reasons were well known. You could say they should have stuck to their guns, but arguably they responded quickly to customer feedback. But however you characterise the issue, customers were not prepared to trade the convenience they paid for and were used to for what appeared to be just a saving for Coles.
They weren’t just tweaking things a bit, so it wasn’t a question of communication. It was a major renegotiation of their bargain with customers and their role in our lives.
Companies need to think long and hard before they decide to force a change of norms. It’s a truly strategic move and not a communications activity. It is going to hit the bottom line. If you aren’t ready for that, stick with market norms until change is enshrined in legislation and creates an even playing field.
But if you want to take leadership and force a change, be ready to bear the innovation costs that brings, with the deep research, creative solutions and executive leadership that entails.
Those organisations that have the courage to stick with this sort of deep strategy and brave any short-term fluctuations are rewarded with more loyal customers and brand advocates.
Lisa Hagan is a director of Pivot, a strategic business consultancy and part of the Frost Collective.
- Pollution
- Opinion
Most Viewed in Business
A relationship banned under traditional law.
Our new podcast series from the team behind Phoebe's Fall
View episodes
- Opinion
- Business
- Consumer affairs
- Pollution
"@context":"http://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":["@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":"@id":"https://www.smh.com.au/business","name":"Business","@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":"@id":"https://www.smh.com.au/business/consumer-affairs","name":"Consumer affairs","@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":"@id":"https://www.smh.com.au/topic/pollution-60n","name":"Pollution"]
Why Coles misjudged the plastic bag backlash
Honestly, the plastic bag furore surprised me. On the whole, supermarkets are pretty good at shaping behaviour. Product placement, the music, even the smell is designed to ensure we buy in certain ways.
So how is it that our clued-up retailers are having such as hard time removing those convenient but environmentally unfriendly plastic bags? It’s a behaviour-shaping move that should be right in their wheelhouse, so what went wrong?
Sociologists argue that we live in two worlds: one where social norms dominate and the other where market norms dominate. And we have historically been pretty good at keeping those worlds separate.
For a long time, corporations happily operated under a market norm, and customers were happy with that. But increasingly, businesses are noticing emerging trends and social norms, and are putting them to work selling. Companies, including supermarkets, routinely shape narratives to consumers and set social bargains with them, based on these social norms.
Coles and Woolworths position themselves as a partner to Australian families, offering convenience, low prices and unfettered choice. It was a market play at heart, based on low cost and a sleek supply chain rather than differentiation, but it came wrapped in a social norm of support and reliability. We knew we were paying for bags, but it was politely indirect, unlimited and handy.
Then supermarkets heard a growing expectation of environmental stewardship. They heard consumers telling them that food at any cost wasn’t enough anymore and that we were looking for leadership in sustainability.
At this point, common wisdom suggests supermarkets needed to do two things: make a choice to support sustainability, and talk to their customers about it. And they did. They decided to cut "free" plastic bags, they set a date and stuck to the plan. But far from shaping behaviour, they irritated consumers.
The backlash against the Coles flip-flop wasn't caused by a lack of communication - it was well advertised, and the reasons were well known. You could say they should have stuck to their guns, but arguably they responded quickly to customer feedback. But however you characterise the issue, customers were not prepared to trade the convenience they paid for and were used to for what appeared to be just a saving for Coles.
They weren’t just tweaking things a bit, so it wasn’t a question of communication. It was a major renegotiation of their bargain with customers and their role in our lives.
Companies need to think long and hard before they decide to force a change of norms. It’s a truly strategic move and not a communications activity. It is going to hit the bottom line. If you aren’t ready for that, stick with market norms until change is enshrined in legislation and creates an even playing field.
But if you want to take leadership and force a change, be ready to bear the innovation costs that brings, with the deep research, creative solutions and executive leadership that entails.
Those organisations that have the courage to stick with this sort of deep strategy and brave any short-term fluctuations are rewarded with more loyal customers and brand advocates.
Lisa Hagan is a director of Pivot, a strategic business consultancy and part of the Frost Collective.
- Pollution
- Opinion
Most Viewed in Business
A relationship banned under traditional law.
Our new podcast series from the team behind Phoebe's Fall
View episodes
- Opinion
- Business
- Consumer affairs
- Pollution
"@context":"http://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":["@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":"@id":"https://www.smh.com.au/business","name":"Business","@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":"@id":"https://www.smh.com.au/business/consumer-affairs","name":"Consumer affairs","@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":"@id":"https://www.smh.com.au/topic/pollution-60n","name":"Pollution"]
Why Coles misjudged the plastic bag backlash
- Opinion
- Business
- Consumer affairs
- Pollution
"@context":"http://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":["@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":"@id":"https://www.smh.com.au/business","name":"Business","@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":"@id":"https://www.smh.com.au/business/consumer-affairs","name":"Consumer affairs","@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":"@id":"https://www.smh.com.au/topic/pollution-60n","name":"Pollution"]
By Lisa Hagan
13 August 2018 — 11:16pm
Honestly, the plastic bag furore surprised me. On the whole, supermarkets are pretty good at shaping behaviour. Product placement, the music, even the smell is designed to ensure we buy in certain ways.
So how is it that our clued-up retailers are having such as hard time removing those convenient but environmentally unfriendly plastic bags? It’s a behaviour-shaping move that should be right in their wheelhouse, so what went wrong?
Sociologists argue that we live in two worlds: one where social norms dominate and the other where market norms dominate. And we have historically been pretty good at keeping those worlds separate.
For a long time, corporations happily operated under a market norm, and customers were happy with that. But increasingly, businesses are noticing emerging trends and social norms, and are putting them to work selling. Companies, including supermarkets, routinely shape narratives to consumers and set social bargains with them, based on these social norms.
Coles and Woolworths position themselves as a partner to Australian families, offering convenience, low prices and unfettered choice. It was a market play at heart, based on low cost and a sleek supply chain rather than differentiation, but it came wrapped in a social norm of support and reliability. We knew we were paying for bags, but it was politely indirect, unlimited and handy.
Then supermarkets heard a growing expectation of environmental stewardship. They heard consumers telling them that food at any cost wasn’t enough anymore and that we were looking for leadership in sustainability.
At this point, common wisdom suggests supermarkets needed to do two things: make a choice to support sustainability, and talk to their customers about it. And they did. They decided to cut "free" plastic bags, they set a date and stuck to the plan. But far from shaping behaviour, they irritated consumers.
The backlash against the Coles flip-flop wasn't caused by a lack of communication - it was well advertised, and the reasons were well known. You could say they should have stuck to their guns, but arguably they responded quickly to customer feedback. But however you characterise the issue, customers were not prepared to trade the convenience they paid for and were used to for what appeared to be just a saving for Coles.
They weren’t just tweaking things a bit, so it wasn’t a question of communication. It was a major renegotiation of their bargain with customers and their role in our lives.
Companies need to think long and hard before they decide to force a change of norms. It’s a truly strategic move and not a communications activity. It is going to hit the bottom line. If you aren’t ready for that, stick with market norms until change is enshrined in legislation and creates an even playing field.
But if you want to take leadership and force a change, be ready to bear the innovation costs that brings, with the deep research, creative solutions and executive leadership that entails.
Those organisations that have the courage to stick with this sort of deep strategy and brave any short-term fluctuations are rewarded with more loyal customers and brand advocates.
Lisa Hagan is a director of Pivot, a strategic business consultancy and part of the Frost Collective.
- Pollution
- Opinion
Most Viewed in Business
A relationship banned under traditional law.
Our new podcast series from the team behind Phoebe's Fall
View episodes
Then supermarkets heard a growing expectation of environmental stewardship. They heard consumers telling them that food at any cost wasn’t enough anymore and that we were looking for leadership in sustainability.
At this point, common wisdom suggests supermarkets needed to do two things: make a choice to support sustainability, and talk to their customers about it. And they did. They decided to cut "free" plastic bags, they set a date and stuck to the plan. But far from shaping behaviour, they irritated consumers.
The backlash against the Coles flip-flop wasn't caused by a lack of communication - it was well advertised, and the reasons were well known. You could say they should have stuck to their guns, but arguably they responded quickly to customer feedback. But however you characterise the issue, customers were not prepared to trade the convenience they paid for and were used to for what appeared to be just a saving for Coles.
They weren’t just tweaking things a bit, so it wasn’t a question of communication. It was a major renegotiation of their bargain with customers and their role in our lives.
Companies need to think long and hard before they decide to force a change of norms. It’s a truly strategic move and not a communications activity. It is going to hit the bottom line. If you aren’t ready for that, stick with market norms until change is enshrined in legislation and creates an even playing field.
But if you want to take leadership and force a change, be ready to bear the innovation costs that brings, with the deep research, creative solutions and executive leadership that entails.
Those organisations that have the courage to stick with this sort of deep strategy and brave any short-term fluctuations are rewarded with more loyal customers and brand advocates.
Lisa Hagan is a director of Pivot, a strategic business consultancy and part of the Frost Collective.
Replay
Playing in 5 ...
Playing in 5 ...
- Pollution
- Opinion
Most Viewed in Business
A relationship banned under traditional law.
Our new podcast series from the team behind Phoebe's Fall
View episodes
- Pollution
- Opinion
- Pollution
- Opinion
Most Viewed in Business
The Sydney Morning Herald
Twitter
Facebook
Instagram
RSS
Copyright © 2018
Fairfax Media
FeedbackSubscribe
The Sydney Morning Herald
Copyright © 2018
Fairfax Media
FeedbackSubscribe
FeedbackSubscribe
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP